lichess.org
Donate

How good is game analysis ?:D

I was very deeply analysing this game because i suspect this JoeGrey is a cheater, but thats not the point.
http://nb.lichess.org/pQw2EwBi/black#33
I find out that after white takes in 17th move black can take a lot out of there taking the h3 pawn with bishop, stockfish also seems to see that as a best move but here it's not and adventage is still just -2 :D
Please don't publicly accuse people of cheating; use the report form instead.

You're welcome to "Continue from here" from that position against Stockfish, as I have done. It seems to me that 17... Bxh3?? quickly loses the game:
http://en.lichess.org/dC58qFzi/black
There are cheaters everywhere. His progress curve looks very strange, usually no one improves his rating in that way. Looks like an engine.
I'm not disputing what you say, but...

Please don't publicly accuse people of cheating; use the report form instead.
Taodofsky #24 Qg2 is a huge mistake, almost a blunder i would say. You had enormous advantage before that move, also it was better to check with queen instead rook but ok. Best move where you made mistake is QE6, the advantage is again enormous, whatever this engine is that analyses the game, i can beat it with 15/10 time control with no doubt... Maybe 1 takeback also :P But that's just because i am human, just the fact it didn't saw this huge advantage here and later ate your bishop with bishop is just lol... Weak engine.
SF 6 gives 17... Bxh3 about (-4.00) on my computer too after about 2 seconds
I dunno if it matters that much, for practical purposes -2 is the same as -4
still a difference of 2 pawns
-4 is 2 pawns ?xD Actually its 4 pawns or at least a minor piece and better position.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.